Thinking About Facades

A Theoretical Perspective for Useful Prototypes

Overview

Authors

Photo of Marc Schiler, FASES, LC

Marc Schiler, FASES, LC

Professor

University of Southern California

marcs@usc.edu


Keywords


Abstract

There have been three decades of liberating developments in the application of descriptive geometry and freeform design methods, as well as the ability to use tools such as Building Information Modeling to translate such designs into construction documents. This has resulted in a fracture in the very concept of what envelope and facade may describe or mean. Furthermore, high performance materials have created both opportunities and dangers in managing the impact of facades on the microclimate that surrounds buildings, as well as the space contained within. There is a need for ways to organize and think about the building skin that allow us to recognize patterns and implications and assist in making decisions that impact construction and building performance. This is the type of theory that architecture currently ignores in favor of more contextual or esoteric pursuits.

A new paradigm of facade tectonics is proposed, beginning with a taxonomy. What phyla and species do facades fall into? What are the common characteristics? How do those categories typically perform? What are the issues that need to be addressed at the earliest stages of design for each tectonic type? Characteristics of materiality, morphology, multiplicity of layers, intelligent and interactive processes, filtering, blocking, reflecting, structural and non-structural, double skins, open sky gardens and typical issues of scale are considered.

Examples and case studies of various types consider how those built projects explore those interactions and benefit or pay the price for the categories they typify. Phyla and species of facades are identified in an effort to guide the choice, the development and the construction of such groups, before construction and experience provide more costly lessons. Finally, it suggests a way to think about facade tectonics that is more than a catalog of parts, hastily assembled.

Introduction

There have been developments in software which have revolutionized the design process. Computer Aided Design led to 3-dimensional design and rendering, which gave way to process defined form. Three dimensional

Access Restricted

Members get unlimited access to all of our resources. Join now for the best value.

Background (A Brief History)

Early software was a replacement for drafting. AutoCAD, VersaCAD, StarCAD, etc. generated floorplans, elevations, sections, details and was an assemblage of two dimensional “drawings.” There was soon the ability to

Access Restricted

Members get unlimited access to all of our resources. Join now for the best value.

Method

In understanding large amounts of data, it is useful to look for patterns and groupings. Using an approach that has been successful in previous attempts is an excellent starting point

Access Restricted

Members get unlimited access to all of our resources. Join now for the best value.

Data (Testing)

How are these genera defined? What are their characteristics? How can those questions and the genera, as categories along with predictions, be tested?

Skin

Façades in the genus skin

Access Restricted

Members get unlimited access to all of our resources. Join now for the best value.

Explanation / Behavioral Characteristics and Useful Predictions

Of what use is such a taxonomy? If each genus has its typical characteristics, problems and benefits can be predicted in advance. The theoretical becomes consequential to the formal, the

Access Restricted

Members get unlimited access to all of our resources. Join now for the best value.

Conclusion

Whatever theoretical decision is made has a predictable or likely impact, downstream. This is in contrast to many forms of architectural theory, which illuminate problems or the sources of conflict

Access Restricted

Members get unlimited access to all of our resources. Join now for the best value.

Acknowledgements

Several individuals have provided concepts for this paper, including Professpr Doug Noble, Winfred Ho and Professor Marc Angelil. USC faculty research funds were used to photograph buildings in the UK. Thanks to Terri Boake and Elizabeth Valmont for photographs (attributed).

Rights and Permissions

Barsky, Brian A. and Donald P. Greenberg. “Determining a set of B-spline control vertices to generate an interpolating surface.” Computer Graphic Image Processes, 14:203--226, November 1980.

Gramazio, Fabio and Matthias Kohler, Made by Robots: Challenging Architecture at a Larger Scale, ISBN: 978-1-118-53548-6, June 2014

Gramazio, Fabio, “Digital Materiality in Architecture,” lecture, Mar. 20, 2014 -

= downloaded 24 September, 2017

Linnaeus, Carl, Systema Naturae ,1735, and Philosophia Botanica, 1751 and Species Plantarum, Vol I and Vol II, Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm, 1753.

McPartland, Richard, “Glorious graphene and its revolutionary applications for construction.” NBS, 01 March 2017. https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/glorious-graphene-and-its-revolutionary-applications-for-construction, downloaded Janruary 15, 2017.

Salingaros, Nikos, “A Theory of Architecture Part 1: Pattern Language vs. Form Language” 23 March, 2014, http://www.designworldonline.com/organic-shape-modeling-for-engineers/)

Schiler, Marc, “Performative Skins: Upon Reflection,” Facade Tectonics presentation, unpublished lecture, University of Southern California, August, 2011.

Trubiano, Franca, “Performance Based Envelopes: A Theory of Spatialized Skins and the Emergence of the Integrated Design Professional,” Buildings 2013, 3(4), 689-712; doi:10.3390/buildings3040689

Spector, Dina, “6 Futuristic Construction Materials That Will Change The Way We Build Stuff,” Business Insider, Apr. 29, 2014, http://www.businessinsider.com/futuristic-construction-materials-2014-4 downloaded 15 January, 2018.