Orbit Tower

Proposal for a Hybrid Structural-Facade System Featuring a Self-Adaptive Solar Shading Device

Overview

Authors

Photo of Enrica Oliva

Enrica Oliva

Werner Sobek New York

enrica.oliva@wernersobek.com

Photo of Michele Andaloro

Michele Andaloro

Project Manager and Engineer

Werner Sobek Stuttgart

michele.andaloro@wernersobek.comwe

Photo of Werner Sobek

Werner Sobek

Werner Sobek

werner.sobek@wernersobek.com


Keywords


Abstract

While most of high-rise buildings feature a core surrounded by a spatial frame defining the volume, one could envision a column-free plan where the perimeter structure is constituted of steel cables, working in tension to suspend the floor plates and transferring the loads to the core by means of story-high trusses located along the perimeter, as well as diagonally across the floor, at the mechanical levels.

The steel cables feature custom fittings to support the fully-glazed skin and allow for an optimized redistribution of the loads between the supporting members. The resulting hybrid scheme has beneficial impacts from a structural, sustainability, and indoor environmental quality standpoint.

The abundant natural light, penetrating through the fully-glazed skin, is controlled by an adaptive shading system, integrated with the IGU, consisting of perforated steel sheets woven together by two-way shape-memory alloy hinges that enable the component to work like an origami, opening and folding automatically according to the exterior environmental conditions: in the summer, the unfolded geometry creates an external overhang that varies with each panel exposure and alleviates the energy demand required for cooling; in the winter, the folded shape allows for a higher solar heat gain, thus lowering the heating energy demand. Therefore, the self-adaptive skin designed allows for unobstructed views throughout the envelope, as well as for an optimized control of the light, both in terms of energy and of daylighting comfort, thus mastering a Class A metropolitan office space.

Ultimately, the proposed hybrid scheme, fostering an optimized behavior of the load bearing members and an absolute minimization of the facade elements, has led to significant improvements: 11% less steel, 6% less concrete, 35% less embodied energy are required, when compared to a standard high-rise construction with identical geometry and featuring steel columns around the perimeter and an aluminum curtain wall facade.

Introduction

There are several ways to improve the energy performance of a building; however a certain level of compromise in terms of aesthetics, natural daylight and organization of the interior spaces

Members Only

Background

Smart Materials are capable of automatically and inherently sensing or detecting changes in their environment and responding to those changes with some kind of actuation or action (Lelieveld, 2013). These

Members Only

Method

Overview

An innovative cable-suspended structural skin replaces the typical aluminum-and-glass curtain wall in a 44-story office building in the heart of Manhattan, New York, significantly reducing its embodied energy and

Members Only

Fabrication

The fabrication process for the shading system envisions contemporary cutting edge techniques, such as numerically controlled machines and robot, which enable for a flexible and efficient management of mass-customized products

Members Only

Performance Optimization

Another crucial feature of the metal sheets is the perforation pattern that is beneficial from multiple points of view:

From a structural standpoint, it cuts the selfweight of the

Members Only

Data

Daylighting

The daylighting study has included five parameters in order to validate the performance of the proposed design in terms of natural light utilization and comfort for the users. The

Members Only

Explanation

The analysis shows that the proposed design has a good daylighting behavior: the floor plan is well lit and the natural light plays a key role in mastering the interior

Members Only

Conclusion and Future Work

The following assumptions have been made for a “conventional” office building with identical geometry, as a means of comparison with the proposed solution:

Geometry and program

Identical to the proposed

Members Only

Acknowledgements

ODA New York – architectural design credit
Metals in Construction magazine 2017 Design Challenge – entry was awarded 1st prize
Maritime Museum – structural and facade engineering concept by Werner Sobek

Rights and Permissions

Lelieveld, C.M.J.L. “Smart Materials for the Realization of an Adaptive Building Component” Doctoral Thesis TU Delft (2013).

Pesenti, M., Masera, G., Fiorito, F., Sauchellia, M. “Kinetic Solar Skin: a Responsive Folding Technique” Energy Procedia Volume 70 (2015): 661-672.

Pesenti, M., Masera, G., Fiorito, F. “Shaping an Origami shading device through visual and thermal simulations” Energy Procedia 78 (2015): 346-351.

Scuderi, G. “Self-adaptive membrane for the building envelope of the future” Platea Magazine (2016).

Beer, B. “Glazed cable facades and special structures - Focus on complex geometries and warping deflections of insulating glass units” Glass Performance Days 2009 (2009).

Addington, M., Kienzl, N., and Schodek, D. “Smart Materials and Technologies in Architecture” Harvard Design School Design and Technology Report Series 2(2002).

Schwartz, M. The Encyclopedia of Smart Materials. John Wiley and Sons, 2002.

Addington, M., Schodek, D. Smart materials and new technologies for the architecture and design professions. Architectural Press, 2005.

Antonelli, P. Mutant Materials in Contemporary Design. MoMA, 1995.

Yamauchi, K., Ohkata, I., Tsuchiya, K., Miyazaki, S. Shape Memory and Superelastic Alloys. Woodhead Publishing, 2011.

Chamilothori, K., Kampitaki, A.M., Oungrinis, K.A. “Climate-Responsive Shading Systems with Integrated Shape Memory Alloys (SMA)” Conference proceedings of the 8th ENERGY FORUM 2013 on Advanced Building Skins (2013).

Fiorito, F., Sauchelli, M., Arroyo, D., Pesenti, M., Imperadori, M., Masera, G., Ranzi, G. (2016). “Shape morphing solar shadings: a Review” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 55 (2016): 863-884.

Schumacher, M., Schaeffer, O., Vogt, M.M. Move architecture in motion – dynamic components and elements. Birkhäuser, 2010.

Loonen, R.C.G.M., Trčka, M., Cóstola, D., Hensen, J.L.M. “Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2013): 483-93.

Wigginton, M., Harris, J. Intelligent Skins. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.