Invert Auto-Shading

Daylighting Performance and Visual Comfort Analysis of Dynamic Thermostatic Bimetal Shading

Overview

Authors

Photo of Jae Yong Suk

Jae Yong Suk

Assistant Professor

University of Texas at San Antonio

jae.suk@utsa.edu

Photo of Doris Sung

Doris Sung

Associate Professor

University of Southern California

dorissun@usc.edu


Keywords


Abstract

Allowing sufficient amount of natural light while avoiding excessive sunlight penetration is often hard to achieve with static facade systems due to constantly changing outdoor environments such as sky conditions and sun’s positions in relation to building facade orientations. In order to maximize daylighting performance and occupant comfort, dynamic properties of thermostatic bimetal (TBM) to curl in response to changing temperatures was adopted in a newly developed dynamic shading system, InVert™ Windows. As the TBM surface temperature from direct solar radiation increases, TBM pieces between the panes of glass change their shape to block the sunlight away from the building, resulting in shading building’s interiors. When the sun moves away from a respective window and the temperature of the individual pieces decreases, the TBM pieces revert to their original shape and position to allow more diffused skylight into a building. The system maintains outdoor views while TBM pieces change their shapes and positions.

The paper studies daylighting performance and visual comfort achieved by the dynamic shading system using TBM. A simple shoe box (4.0m x 6.0m x 2.5m) building with a full height south facing glazing and dynamic shading system was modeled in Rhinoceros. The following daylighting and visual discomfort metrics were used for performance evaluations: 1) Spatial Daylight Autonomy for annual daylight sufficiency, 2) Annual Sunlight Exposure for excessive sunlight penetrations, and 3) Daylight Glare Probability for visual discomfort. Luminance distribution of various TBM configurations on the interior space was the focus of this investigation. The simulated Spatial Daylight Autonomy and Annual Sunlight Exposure results show that the system successfully blocks excessive sunlight penetrations while redirecting natural light deep into the space. The calculated Daylight Glare Probability scores and luminance distributions confirm that the system greatly relieves potential discomfort glare issue of occupants while allowing direct view to outside.

Introduction

Daylighting design can save building energy consumption and improve occupant well-being when building envelope systems are effectively designed and controlled. High performance building envelope systems help achieve daylighting benefits by

Members Only

Background

In order to maximize daylighting performance and occupant visual comfort, dynamic properties of thermostatic bimetal (TBM) to curl in response to changing temperatures was adopted in a newly developed dynamic

Members Only

Method

A virtual model was built in Rhinoceros software as shown in Figure 4. A closed room with 4.0 m wide x 6.0 m long x 2.5 m high was modeled

Members Only

Analysis

Hourly based daylighting simulations were conducted for an entire year by utilizing a weather data file.

spatial daylight autonomy

Spatial Daylight Autonomy analysis was conducted for three different conditions: 1) without TBM

Members Only

Conclusion and Future Work

Shading performance of TBM shading system was tested in depth by various daylighting simulations. Daylighting availability and occupant’s visual comfort were simulated for three different conditions: 1) without TBM shading

Members Only

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate Nathan Flores, a UTSA graduate student, to create a virtual model in Rhinoceros and to perform annual daylighting simulations.

Rights and Permissions

REFERENCE

Addington, Michelle and Daniel Schodek. “Smart Materials and Technologies for the architecture and design professions”. Architectural Press, Elsevier (2005)

Choi, Joon-Ho, Vivian Loftness, Danny Nou, and Brandon Tinianov. “Impacts of Dynamic Glazing on Office Workers’ Environmental and Psychological Responses.” Architectural Research Centers Consortium (ARCC) conference, Toronto, Canada (2019)

Konis, Kyle. “Evaluating daylighting effectiveness and occupant visual comfort in a side-lit open-plan office buildings in San Francisco, California.” Building and Environment 59 (2013): 662-677

Kensek, Karen and Jae Yong Suk. “Difference between Daylight Factor (overcast sky) and Daylight Availability (clear sky) in Computer-based Daylighting Simulations”, Journal of Creative Sustainable Architecture & Built Environment (CSABE) v1 (2011)

Hirning, Michael, Gillian Isoardi, Coyne S, Ian Cowling, and Veronica Garcia-Hansen. “Post occupancy evaluation relating to discomfort glare: A study of green buildings in Brisbane.” Building and Environment 59 (2013): 349-357

Hirning, Michael, Gillian Isoardi, and Ian Cowling. “Discomfort glare in open plan green buildings.” Energy and Buildings 70 (2014): 427-440

Mardaljevic, John, Lisa Heschong, and Eleanor Lee. Daylight metrics and energy savings, Lighting Research & Technology 41 (3) (2009): 261–283

Montier, Cedric du, Andre Potvin, and Claude MH Demers, “Energy and daylighting potential for Adaptive Facades: Evaluation of movable insulated panels” Proceeding of International Conference on Adaptation and Movement in Architecture, Toronto, Canada (2013)

Suk, Jae Yong. “Can hourly-based annual daylighting simulations predict daylight availability in dynamic sky?” Architectural Research Centers Consortium (ARCC) conference, Toronto, Canada (2019)

Suk, Jae Yong and Marc Schiler. “Investigation of Evalglare Software, Daylight Glare Probability and High Dynamic Range Imaging for Daylight Glare Analysis.” Lighting Research and Technology (2012)

Suk, Jae Yong, Marc Schiler, and Karen Kensek. “Development of new daylight glare analysis methodology using absolute glare factor and relative glare factor.” Energy and Buildings 64 (2013): 113-122

Sung, Doris. “Smart Geometries for Smart Materials: Taming Thermobimetals to Behave” Journal of Architectural Education (2016), 70:1, 96-106

Ritter, Axel. Smart Materials in Architecture, Interior Architecture and Design. Basel: Birkhauser (2007)

Velds, Martine. “User acceptance studies to evaluate discomfort glare in daylit rooms.” Solar Energy 73 (2) (2002): 95–103

Wienold, Jan and Jens Christoffersen, Towards a New Daylight Glare Rating, Lux Europa, Berlin (2005)

Wu, Yujie, Jerome H. Kampf, and Jean-Louis Scartezzini. “Automated 'Eye-sight' Venetian Blinds based on an Embedded Photometric Device with Real-time Daylighting Computing.” Applied Energy v.252 (2019)